As datacentres look to increase their energy efficiency and provide predictable cooling to their high-density racks, they are faced the choice of whether to adopt hot-aisle or cold-aisle containment. Aisle containment can offer benefits to both existing and new build datacentres and can help to remove ‘hot-spots’ and deliver uniform air temperatures to server inlets.
In an uncontained air flow data centre, room cooling systems are tasked with the delivery of cool air throughout the room. This is an uncontained layout and can lead to less predictable air flow within the room and potentially the need for computational fluid dynamic (CFD) modelling.
More info: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computational_fluid_dynamics
In a server room or datacentre environment racks can be arranged into hot and cold-aisles. The front of the racks draw-in cool air (cold-aisle) and exhaust this through the rear of the cabinets into a ‘hot-aisle’. Containment looks to separate the cool and hot air and avoid them mixing and leads to drier and warmer air being returned to the air conditioners for cooling. Analysis shows that hot-aisle containment can lead to higher energy savings (up to 40%) and is the preferred option for new-build datacentres. The benefits of either containment approach can be summarised as:
A hot-aisle containment system encloses the hot aisle only and collects the heat output from the IT equipment. The rest of the datacentre becomes a cold-air return plenum. The two air supplies are prevented from mixing. Again this arrangement requires the datacentre racks to be arranged into a consistent hot-aisle and cold-aisle configuration. This type of HAC is ideal for new build datacentres, smaller datacentres and server rooms and high-density rack zones.
An alternative HACs arrangement is to have the air ducted from the hot-aisle containment to a computer room air handler (CRAH) or large remote AC unit using a chimney located above the hot-aisle containment. This arrangement is best suited to new datacentres and may require bespoke fabricated air plenums and a custom build to handle the large air flow.
It is important to ensure that the overall ambient temperatures do not rise uncomfortably high for IT technicians and datacentre engineers. Using a cold-aisle containment system, the general working area becomes the hot-aisle and the reverse is true when using a hot-aisle containment system.
ASHRAE Standard TC9.9 (2008) recommends IT inlet temperatures of 18-27˚C. Using a cold-aisle containment system the air outside the CAC can rise above 27˚C and as high as 38˚C if high density servers are deployed. This can present uncomfortable working and visitor conditions for those not experienced with cold-aisle environments and working practices. Non-racked IT systems may also require their own cooling arrangements (via ducting) in order to ensure their reliable operation in such an environment.
The overall energy efficiency savings of hot-aisle containment over an uncontained environment can be as high as 40% or more. The savings come from less energy required by the cooling system. Cold-aisle containment can also show energy savings over uncontained environments of around 10% in comparison. The difference lies in the way both impact the air return to the cooling system units. Both forms of containment (CACS and HACS) will lose energy efficiency due to cold air leakage. Some air leakage is inevitable, and the ‘waisted’ energy comes from the energy required to power fans and pumps.
Cold-aisle containment is easier to implement as it does not require additional fabrication to contain exhaust air. A CAC system only requires doors at both ends of the air and a roof partition. Cold-aisles are therefore easier and less costly to install within existing server rooms and datacentres. Cold air can leak through floor tiles and the overall Delta T is lower leading to decreased efficiency.
Hot-aisle containment ensures that the open server room area is colder and provides a more acceptable working environment for technicians and engineers. There should be little impact from leakage from the hot-aisle into the cold space but any represents the potential to lower the overall effect and energy efficiency savings. A HAC system is more expensive and can require bespoke fabrication. The hot-aisle can also be an uncomfortable working area for engineers and technicians who may have to let in cool air during their time in the aisle.
For both sets of server room or datacentre containment system it is important to ensure there is adequate environment and temperature monitoring and to ensure that there are no obstructions for the installed fire suppression system.
The problem of how to efficiently cool server rooms and datacentres is become more complex. Today’s IT environment can include a mixture of IT servers including high density racks leading to ‘hot-spots’ within racks and spread throughout a server environment. Edge computing will increase the complexity of the problem using remote compute facilities that may be more exposed to external ambient temperatures.